BK-L Archives

Archiver > BK > 2005-03 > 1110754440


From: "Otto Jørgensen" <>
Subject: Re: [BK] BK Date Validation
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:54:00 +0100
References: <011d01c5281a$b3c4b140$647ba8c0@ab.hsia.telus.net> <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAlgtWQexo9kS53rKZOymk88KAAAAQAAAAIo+TmfNoOUiR3Pm7ZPcrTQEAAAAA@adslhome.dk>
In-Reply-To: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAlgtWQexo9kS53rKZOymk88KAAAAQAAAAIo+TmfNoOUiR3Pm7ZPcrTQEAAAAA@adslhome.dk>


On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:24:19 +0100, "Ole P. Bielefeldt"
<> wrote:

>31 April would never have been accepted in FTM.
>

there is also warning that this is not a legal date.

but you will accept 1 Easterday 1891 ?
that is legal ;)

--
Otto Jørgensen
http://home.online.no/~otjoerge/bk/
All email is checked by NORTON


This thread: