BK-L Archives

Archiver > BK > 2006-03 > 1141232076


From: "Louanne Van Pelt" <>
Subject: Re: [BK] BK BACKUPS.
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 09:54:36 -0700
References: <hhc902huat74ln8gs54mjadjm87inq2fth@4ax.com>


I am reading this message in all the sizes available to me. Hope you can too. L
----- Original Message -----
From: Otto Jørgensen<mailto:>
To: <mailto:>
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: [BK] BK BACKUPS.


On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:57:24 -0600, Gary Presson
<<mailto:>> wrote:

>
>
>Howard Ray Lawrence wrote:
>
>
>> [AS MY SIGHT DIMINISHES, I LOVE UPPERCASE TYPEFACE: IT IS SO EASY TO READ.
>> AND, CONVENTIONS ABOUT NOT USING SUCH TYPOGRAPHY ARE VERY QUESTIONABLE, NARROW-MINDED.
>> THOSE WHO ARE FREE MAY CHOOSE ANY WAY OF CLEARLY, AND SOMETIMES UNCONVENTIONALLY, COMMUNICATING.]
>
>NO NEED TO APLOGIZE FOR USING AND/OR REQUESTING UPPER CASE. ALSO THERE ARE SOME WHO USE UPPER CASE
>BECASE OF OTHER PHYSICAL LIMITATIONS. OVER THE YEARS WE HAVE ENCOUNTERED FOLKS WHO NEEDED TO USE A
>MOUTH STICK OR FOREHEAD STICK TO KEY THEIR COMPUTERS.
>
>I GET A LITTLE PEEVED AT THOSE WHO ARE SO **LAZY**, THAT THEY CAN'T BE BOTHERED WITH THEIR SHIFT
>KEYS AND TYPE IN ALL LOWER CASE....HOWEVER.
>
>GARY, WICHITA, KS..
>
For me it is difficult to read if ine use only uppercase.
That gives me a huge problem

--
Otto Jørgensen
http://home.online.no/~otjoerge/bk/<http://home.online.no/~otjoerge/bk/>;
All email is checked by NIS2005

______________________________

This thread: