BOARD-L Archives

From: <>
Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 22:47:04 EDT

In a message dated 7/10/99 9:51:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
writes:

<<
Since there seems no better solution, Bill's idea of "one time secretary
casting the single vote for both candidates." gets my vote.
>>
If that is a motion I will second it.

Thanks,

David C. Young

This thread:

• Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by <>
  • Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by Bonnie McVicar-Briggs <>
  • [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by "Lynn" <>
  • Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by Bonnie McVicar-Briggs <>
  • Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by <>
  • [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by Tim Stowell <>
  • Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by <>
  • Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by <>
  • Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by "Beth Wills" <>
  • Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by jpowelljr <>
  • Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by Bill Oliver <>
  • Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by "Bridgett Smith" <>
  • Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by Joe Zsedeny <>
  • Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by Bonnie McVicar-Briggs <>
  • Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by "Ms. Piglet" <>
  • Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by Betsy Mills <>
  • [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by Bill Oliver <>
  • Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by <>
  • [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by Tim Stowell <>
  • Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by "Lynn" <>
  • Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by Bonnie McVicar-Briggs <>

  • Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by <>

  • Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-20 by "Lynn" <>