BOARD-L Archives

Archiver > BOARD > 2000-03 > 0951933028


From: "Garnett J.(Joe) Zsedeny" <>
Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Census Board Seat Motion
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 12:50:28 -0500


I would be satisfied if our Election Committee verified the
selection in a manner similar to the way my selection was
verified. All I am concerned with is that the CP volunteers
actually make the selection.

Joe


RichPump wrote:
>
> "Garnett J.(Joe) Zsedeny" wrote:
>
> <Snip>
>
> Joe would expand on "verified nominee" Please? How verified?
> By whom? Richard...
>
> > Let me add that if Motion 00-4 passes I would think that a
> > verified nominee from the Census Project should be seated.
> > To do otherwise would be unfair and would worsen a situation
> > which most of us would like to see resolved.
> >
> > Joe
> >
> > Teri Pettit wrote:
> > >
> > > >At 04:44 PM 2/29/00 -0800, Teri Pettit wrote:
> > > ><snip>
> > > >>So are you saying that there are three lists, one for Ron & Kathy's
> > > >>Census Project, one for The USGenWeb Archives Census Project, and
> > > >>one for the members of The USGenWeb Archives Project, and the
> > > >>volunteers of The USGenWeb Archives Census Project are NOT allowed
> > > >>to subscribe to the list for The USGenWeb Archives Project unless
> > > >>they happen to also be USGenWeb Archives Project File Managers at
> > > >>the state or county level?
> > > >
> > > >There are at least 3 mailing lists for Ron's Census Project -- one for
> > > >transcribers, one for the state coordinators and a third for the upper
> > > >echelon folks. All are closed and unarchived.
> > >
> > > OK, but I am really asking about the _other_ Census Project. It is
> > > pretty clear that Ron's Census Project does not consider itself
> > > to be a subproject of The USGenWeb Archives Project, so there is
> > > no question as to whether they are represented by the representative
> > > for The USGenWeb Archives Project or not. Plainly they are not, as
> > > they have consistently rejected any fealty to that project.
> > >
> > > What is _not_ clear is whether The USGenWeb Archives Census Project
> > > does or does not consider itself to be a subproject of The USGenWeb
> > > Archives Project.
> > >
> > > As I understand it, both Census Projects consider their files to be
> > > part of The USGenWeb Project Archives, but the members of The USGenWeb
> > > Archives Census Project feel that all files that are part of The
> > > USGenWeb Project Archives should be under the same top-level directory
> > > as the files of The USGenWeb Archives Project, while the members of
> > > Ron's USGenWeb Census Project feel that scope of The USGenWeb Project
> > > Archives can encompass files stored in a variety of directories. This
> > > is a real difference of opinion, and I am not taking any stance on it.
> > > But it is a separate issue than that of whether the volunteers consider
> > > themselves to be members of The USGenWeb Archives Project or not.
> >
> > --
> > Zsedeny Genealogy - http://www.rootsweb.com/~jzed/home.htm
> > NDGenWeb Archives -
> > http://www.rootsweb.com/~usgenweb/nd/ndfiles.htm
> > Pembina County, ND -
> > http://www.rootsweb.com/~ndpembin/pembina.htm
> > Ramsey County, ND -
> > http://www.rootsweb.com/~ndramsey/ramsey.htm
>
> --
>
> Richard M. Howland
> Mailto: ICQ # 898319
> NE/NCR CC Representative
>
> HOWLAND-L List Co-ordinator WOODWORKING-L list Co-ordinator
> VARNER-L List Co-ordinator FISHING-L list Co-ordinator
> ILPIATT-L List Co-ordinator HEDGEHOGS-L List Co-ordinator
> TXYOUNG-L List Co-ordinator
>
> http://www.rootsweb.com/~ilpiatt/piatt.htm
> http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~richpump/YoungCountyCemPage.htm
> http://www.pets.rootsweb.com/~hedgehogs/index.html
> http://www.crafts.rootsweb.com/~woodworking/index.html
> http://www.wf.net/~richpump/HowlandOnLine.html

--
Zsedeny Genealogy - http://www.rootsweb.com/~jzed/home.htm
NDGenWeb Archives -
http://www.rootsweb.com/~usgenweb/nd/ndfiles.htm
Pembina County, ND -
http://www.rootsweb.com/~ndpembin/pembina.htm
Ramsey County, ND -
http://www.rootsweb.com/~ndramsey/ramsey.ht

This thread: