BOARD-L Archives

Archiver > BOARD > 2000-06 > 0960078381


From: Pam Reid <>
Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Fwd: Motion 00-14
Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2000 20:26:21 -0400


That's what I thought, too. The group that Carol sent were pretty petty
and I thought that was what we were refering to in the motion.

Pam

Joy Fisher wrote:
>
> I took it to mean the group of 5 from C. Hammett that were designed to use
> USGenWeb to beat RootsWeb over the head.
>
> At 02:48 PM 6/3/00 -0500, you wrote:
> >Joe,
> >Would you please clarify your motion. Are you moving
> >that all grievances submitted to the AB prior to your
> >motion are included in this? That is the way I could read it.
> >If that is not the case would you consider amending your
> >motion to show just which grievances, and which
> >submitter, your motion addresses.
> >At the moment the motion appears to me to be a little
> >too broad in it's scope and could be intrepreted to mean
> >that any grievance submitted to this board is frivolous and
> >therefore should be dismissed.
> >My reasoning for this that there have been quite a few
> >grievances submitted. None have been addressed that I'm
> >aware of. Each grievance should be addressed seperately
> >to determine the merits of each and I am still greatly
> >concerned about addressing grievances filed against this
> >board or members of it. I see no fair way we can address
> >those ourselves.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Ginger
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Betsy Mills <>
> >To: <>
> >Date: Saturday, June 03, 2000 2:38 PM
> >Subject: [BOARD-L] Fwd: Motion 00-14
> >
> >
> > >Forwarding for Tim Stowell, as requested:
> > >
> > >>Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 12:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
> > >>From: Tim Stowell <>
> > >>Subject: Motion 00-14
> > >>
> > >> For background on the motion made by Joe seconded by
> > >>Joy:
> > >>
> > >>"By submitting these grievances to the Board the
> > >>"aggrieved" party(s) is/are invoking Section I of
> > >>Article XIV which requests the Advisory Board to
> > >>advise on issues related to grievances and appeals. My
> > >>advice is that the grievances are purely spiteful and
> > >>meant to disrupt and cause disarray among the Project
> > >>members."
> > >>
> > >>The motion below is given the number 00-14. The floor
> > >>is now open for discussion.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>"Therefore, I move that the grievances be dismissed as
> > >>frivolous and purely political in nature."
> > >>
> > >>Tim
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >

This thread: