BOARD-L Archives

Archiver > BOARD > 2000-07 > 0962557780


From: "Maggie Stewart" <>
Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 00-20
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 13:09:40 -0400


Virginia,

See my answer to Jim for your first question. This motion is
a clarification to Motion 00-19. Part of the difficulty with saying
that you are going to "follow the procedures of past elections" is
that it is very broad and can be interpreted many different ways.
One could say that this means only national level special projects.

This motion specifically defines a "group of Coordinators" that
will be allowed to vote. It also gives the future ECs a precedent
on which to determine voter eligibility in future elections.

Maggie


----- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2000 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 00-20


I have some questions. Motion 00-19 which was just passed, said:

> "I move that the Election Committee be directed to follow election
> procedure as was followed in previous elections -- one State Coordinator
> and one Asst. State Coordinator per state/special project and any County
> Coordinator/Assistant County Coordinator/Town Coordinator/Special Project
> File Manager be allowed to vote."

and Motion 00-20 as proposed by Maggie says:

> "I move that State Level Special Projects with CC's meeting
> the cutoff date be allowed a vote in the Fiscal Year 2000 election."

Can someone elaborate on why Motion 20 is needed, since Motion 19 requires
following procedures of past elections? Is this motion referring to a
different kind of State Level Project than has been allowed to vote in the
past?

Maggie, what are you meaning by State Level Projects?

I would appreciate some clarification before this is called for a vote.

Thanks!

Virginia (Ginger) Cisewski
NW-Plains CC Rep

This thread: