BOARD-L Archives

Archiver > BOARD > 2001-04 > 0988693594


From: Tim Stowell <>
Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] CALL THE QUESTION
Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 01:06:34 -0400


At 07:48 PM 4/30/01 -0700, Teri Pettit wrote:
>Maybe it would be a good idea to reverse those subscriptions, or more
>specifically to subscribe to BOARD-L under both addresses and to Board-Exec
>only from home.
>
>BOARD-L by definition is where Board meetings are held, and you are the
>Chair of those meetings. It is very hard to hold a proper meeting when
>the Chair can only be present at night.

How I've been subbed to the lists has worked just fine.

Aren't you the member who requests we not vote on weekends / nights as you
only
have access at work?

>Since Board-Exec is not run under parliamentary procedure and has no chair,
>there is much less need for anyone to maintain a continuous presence there.
>
>Also, it may well be the fact that you cannot read BOARD-L mail half
>the day that causes you to typically introduce new discussion topics
>on Board-Exec even when they are not sensitive, contrary to the policy
>that you announced when you took office, to hold discussions on Board-L.

New discussion topics?

>If subscribing to BOARD-L both at work and home causes you to get too
>much email at work, perhaps you could find some other lists to unsubscribe
>from at work, such as STATE-COORD-L. (I believe it was postings on
>STATE-COORD-L that led Holly to conclude you were online today.)

Nope not on the SC list. Just Exec at work - no other lists. I was
posting there today as you well know.

But, I will take your suggestion under consideration.

Tim

This thread: