BOARD-L Archives

Archiver > BOARD > 2002-01 > 1010544508


From: "Kathy Heidel" <>
Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 02-01 ByLaws Committee Formation - VOTE on the Call
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 20:48:28 -0600


Holly,
I agree to withdraw my motion at this time. I thought since we had
jumped motion 02 that no one was considering 01 and we would just move on. I
stand corrected and I don't mind at all. I do understand that there are many
questions to be ask, especially after seeing the email and again that is
great! I do hope that it won't last till Valentines though ;o}
Thank you all for your input.
Kathy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Eason" <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 02-01 ByLaws Committee Formation - VOTE on the
Call


> Holly,
>
> In light of the honest need to redefine terms
> within this motion I would like to withdraw my second
> to the call, and hopefully Kathy will agree, and we can
> more quickly move forward to make the necessary
> changes and get to the actual vote.
>
> Thanks,
> Ron
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Holly Timm" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 7:04 AM
> Subject: [BOARD-L] Motion 02-01 ByLaws Committee Formation - VOTE on the
> Call
>
>
> > The Question having been called by Kathy Heidel on Motion 02-01 and
> > seconded by Ron Eason, please vote yes or no on the call, yes to proceed
> to
> > the vote, no to discuss it.
> >
> > At 09:40 PM 1/7/02 -0600, Kathy Heidel wrote:
> >
> > >I would like to Call the Question on Motion 02-01 "Bylaws Committee
> > >Formation" as there appears to be no debate on this.
> > >Kathy
> > >
> > >"Speak softly and carry a big stick"
> > >FDR
> >
> >
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>

This thread: