BOARD-L Archives
Archiver > BOARD > 2002-07 > 1025868444
From: Holly Timm <>
Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Fwd: [Board-Exec] Unsubbing
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 07:28:56 -0400
References: <008d01c2236d$65601bc0$dd11bd41@hppav><3.0.5.32.20020701011906.012b1800@mail.chattanooga.net>
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20020705013954.009ec9b0@mail.chattanooga.net>
As Mr. Stowell has made it petulantly clear that he is not reading any
messages from me except on the SC list, as he put it: "not that I'm
reading anything you post anywhere except the SC list." there is no point
in my responding to anything he says anywhere else. If anyone else on this
board has respectfully put questions on this matter, I will endeavor to
reply. If Mr. Stowell persists in his rudeness he will be moderated on this
list. If Mr. Eason continues this topic in the same vein he too will be
moderated.
At 01:39 AM 7/5/02 -0400, Tim Stowell wrote:
>At 11:13 AM 7/4/02 -0400, you wrote:
> >> Tim wrote:
> >> Perhaps someone should say something about the times when you were RAL and
> >> the topics of exec were discussed by you with your bosom buddies? But I
> >guess
> >> that was ok?
> >> Will Teresa and I be banned from Exec for the remainder of your reign?
> >> Will the tone for the rest of your .....administration will be, if you
> >make
> >> the not so esteemed national c.... mad, kiss your cookies goodbye?
>
> >Well, isn't this the pot and the kettle syndrome. It wasn't too long ago
> >when King Timmie was wielding the same ax as he is now accusing someone
> >else of. There is a difference, but I guess that doesn't matter when
> >someone
> >else is wearing the boot.
> >
> >Ron
>
>Sorry Ron, but I was never King. Kings are not elected.
>
>As the Madame NC has not deigned a reply and as I am not aware that
>you are her spokesperson please let her speak for herself.
>
>Whether or not she deigns replying I'll have my answer.
>
>Perhaps the membership would be interested in knowing some of your
>other half-baked ideas? Remember you idea that the Project should
>be run top-down - ie the AB telling SCs who they have to appoint as
>CCs?
>
>Tim
This thread: