BOARD-L Archives

Archiver > BOARD > 2002-11 > 1037310826


From: Richard Harrison <>
Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Discussion
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:53:46 -0800
In-Reply-To: <003a01c28c1d$2bb7c800$c272a00c@wchs>


At 02:34 PM 11/14/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>Mr. NC:
>
>When this term began, we took your word that you had checked with ALL those
>who were qualified and you only found ONE person who was willing to serve as
>NE SC rep. Turned out that you misspoke.

I did not misspeak. I sent emails to all the SCs and ASCs listed on the
Who's Who page--and I did not find anyone as a result of that. It was only
after I asked others to use their personal influence to help find a willing
candidate that one person stepped forward.

>Thus the EC was called on and it has done it's work. Those qualified have
>done what is allowed them to do under Sturgis. That is, they had the right
>to vote, but they could not be compelled to vote. Some chose to not vote.
>
>Now they are going to be questioned as to why they did not vote? This is
>utterly ridiculous. Should we be prepared wait until all the CCs, who do
>not vote when the poll to replace Kathy is conducted, are questioned as to
>why not before we try to seat her replacement?
>
>Phyllis Rippee
>SW/SC CC Representative

I asked for members to delay voting on the motion only to allow for any
additional AB discussion--not to allow responses from those SCs and ASCs
who chose not to vote.



Richard "Isaiah" Harrison
National Coordinator
The USGenWeb Project

This thread: