BOARD-L Archives

Archiver > BOARD > 2003-04 > 1049223897


From: "Jan Cortez" <>
Subject: Re: Re: [BOARD-L] Question Regarding GAGenWeb Project
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 14:04:59 -0500
References: <013901c2f7fa$63a270f0$0f06fea9@JANA>


No, I mean we should not penalize CC's. Obviously I missed the word *not*.
My humble apologies.

Jan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jana Black" <>


> Hi Jan,
>
> So, you say we *should penalize CCs* if the SC does not offer an updated
> list??? Why should we "penalize" CCs for the actions or inactions of an
> SC ????
>
> The motion on the floor *does* allow the list Mr. Stowell offered to be
> included - just that it be reconciled to the previous list using an
> objective system to do so....
>
> Jana
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Cortez [mailto:]
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 5:18 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: Re: [BOARD-L] Question Regarding GAGenWeb Project
>
>
> Jana,
>
> I am not suggesting that two wrongs make a right. I agree that we
> should expect our SC's to have current lists, but, I am *also* saying
> that we should penalize CC's if the SC does not have an updated list.
>
> I do not think its unreasonable to ask an SC for a list due to an
> impending and unexpected election and give them a reasonable amount of
> time to get it for us. Say five days......
>
> Jan
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jana Black" <>
>
>
> > Jan,
> >
> > The point is not to suggest that two wrongs make a right - the point
> > is to "encourage" SCs to hold themselves to higher standards.
> >
> > Jana
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jan Cortez [mailto:]
> > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 4:26 PM
> > To:
> > Subject: Re: Re: [BOARD-L] Question Regarding GAGenWeb Project
> >
> >
> > I would interpret this to mean, the CC's Co-CC's and any other town
> > coordinators and special projects, that were currently doing sites on
> > the date that the list was frozen, that had been in the project within
>
> > the last thirty days, not on one that was not updated.
> >
> > Let us not criticize the GA SC on not having a current list at his
> > fingertips. There are other SC's within this project in the same
> > state of affairs.
> >
> > Jan Cortez
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Richard (Isaiah) Harrison" <>
> >
> >
> > > In response to Roger's opinion regarding whether or not various AB
> > > members have the right to vote in the upcoming GAGenWeb election, I
> > > sent him this follow-up question:
> > >
> > > > > From: "Richard (Isaiah) Harrison" <>
> > > >[snip]
> > > > > Thank you for the opinion which I have forwarded to the AB. That
>
> > > > > still leaves the question of how to determine what is the proper
>
> > > > > voting list
> > to
> > > > > use. The one that was in effect on 3/20/03? The one that Tim
> > > > > Stowell
> > has
> > > > > submitted since then?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Isaiah
> > >
> > > His answer:
> > >
> > > >From: "Roger Swafford" <>
> > > >To: "Richard \(Isaiah\) Harrison" <>
> > > >Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Question Regarding GAGenWeb Project
> > > >Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 16:41:41 -0600
> > > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
> > > >
> > > >Hi Isaiah,
> > > >The adopted rule freezes the voter list, 3/20/03. If the AB desires
>
> > > >to
> > use a
> > > >subsequent list submitted then the AB should amend the adopted
> > > >rule. To
> > use
> > > >a later list violates the freeze part of the rule.
> > > >
> > > >Roger
> > >
> > > -Isaiah
> >
> >
> >
> > ==== BOARD Mailing List ====
> > Board-L minutes and voting records are located at:
> > http://www.usgenweb.com/official/vrecords.html
> >
> >
> > ==== BOARD Mailing List ====
> > Board-L minutes and voting records are located at:
> > http://www.usgenweb.com/official/vrecords.html
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ==== BOARD Mailing List ====
> Check out the Awards and Recognition our project has received:
> http://www.usgenweb.com/about/awards.html
>
>
> ==== BOARD Mailing List ====
> Board-L minutes and voting records are located at:
> http://www.usgenweb.com/official/vrecords.html
>
>


This thread: