BOARD-L Archives

Archiver > BOARD > 2003-04 > 1049230285


From: "Jana Black" <>
Subject: RE: [BOARD-L] Motion: Reconciliation of GAGenWeb Voter List.
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 12:51:25 -0800
In-Reply-To: <039d01c2f885$a913a150$41bb41d8@jancortez>


Jan,

I think I misread your question... But the answer comes down to the same
principle. Yes, a CC who becomes an SC is "still represented" as a CC
regarding the way they handle their county site(s). But once a CC
becomes an SC, they now have an SC Rep to represent them in their SC
capacity. So, if the issue is what a person does as an SC, their CC
status has no bearing and if the issue is what a person does as a CC,
their status as an SC has no bearing.

Jana

-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Cortez [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 11:34 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Motion: Reconciliation of GAGenWeb Voter List.


This just makes me wonder, if a CC becomes an SC, do they cease to be
CC's, even though they do county pages? Are they no longer represented
as CC's?

Jan


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jana Black" <>
My fight is and always has been to represent CCs,
> because that is what I was elected to do.
>
> Jana
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karen Mitchell [mailto:]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 8:43 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Motion: Reconciliation of GAGenWeb Voter List.
>
>
> From: "Jana Black" <>
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 8:00 PM
> Subject: RE: [BOARD-L] Motion: Reconciliation of GAGenWeb Voter List.
>
> Jan said: But we did not consider the CC's in NC that were dismissed.
> Why is that? Jana said: because the AB initiated the process *NOT* the

> CCs of NC.
>
> Karen: Jana, it doesn't matter WHO initiated the process, the basic
> point is that there were issues in EACH state that involved the CC's.
> You can't have it both ways, either you listen to the CC's or you
> don't.
>
> Jan said: [I am not suggesting mass mentality and I realize that all
> situations are different - but there *must* be a basis of fairness in
> the AB. It is simply not fair to look at dismissed CC's one way in NC

> and another in GA. Eligibility to vote must be the same.] Jana said:
> We are not looking at the CCs, we are looking at the situation in the
> state and how it is presented.
>
> Karen: What Jan is saying is that there is discrimination when the
> issues are handled differently, and that the Board should handle each
> case with the same "guidelines". Of course, the cases have different
> aspects, anyone can see that, and Jan knows that, but when you try to
> claim that the cases are so vastly different, you are wrong. The State

> is different, the people are different, that's pretty obvious, isn't
> it? But the fact remains that there are issues that should have some
> basic guidelines applied to justify them as being "fair". How can you
> possibly look at the situation in either State without considering the

> CC's? As a Board Rep. you can not disregard the CC's.
>
> Karen
>
>
> ==== BOARD Mailing List ====
> Standing Procedures for the Advisory Board are located at:
> http://www.usgenweb.com/official/standing-procedures.html
>
>
> ==== BOARD Mailing List ====
> Board-L minutes and voting records are located at:
> http://www.usgenweb.com/official/vrecords.html
>
>



==== BOARD Mailing List ====
Archives for Board-L are located at:
http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/board

This thread: