BOARD-L Archives

Archiver > BOARD > 2003-06 > 1055884833


From: "Don Kelly" <>
Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] MNIGS
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 14:20:33 -0700
References: <001301c3350c$56d0a5a0$6472a00c@wchs>


Sounds right from there, but from ground zero NIGS must be consistently
defined, and accepted by 50 states.

Don

----- Original Message -----
From: "Phyllis Rippee" <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 1:09 PM
Subject: [BOARD-L] MNIGS


> The appeals process would be one way for the mnigs to possibly have
the
> status lifted. This would be used if the mnigs feels that the status
is
> unjustified.
>
> But, there will need to be steps put in place if it is sustained. So,
I
> believe that a time period that the mnigs will remain in effect should
be
> established.........for example, 6 months. At the end of that time,
the
> steps to reinstatement may begin with an apology for what was done
wrong and
> a request for reinstatement...by the mnigs....not by an AB
Representative as
> a matter of routine business.
>
> Phyllis
>
>
> ==== BOARD Mailing List ====
> "No man is good enough to govern another man without that other's
consent."
> Abraham Lincoln (1809 - 1865)
>

This thread: