BOARD-L Archives

Archiver > BOARD > 2003-07 > 1059009918


From: "Jana Black" <>
Subject: RE: [BOARD-L] SC question
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:25:18 -0700
In-Reply-To: <06f601c3517e$ceb23320$c26e5644@D51XKD11>


This may be well and good in terms of time, but it does not address the
positive place of diversity among SCs within the Project to prevent both
burn-out and too narrow a field. Ideally, IMO< there would be different
SCs for every state.....

Jana

-----Original Message-----
From: Angie Rayfield [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 5:59 PM
To:
Subject: RE: [BOARD-L] SC question


Limiting the number of states that you can SC sounds reasonable in
theory, but I think Jan's right. I mean, being SC of Delaware would
probably be a little different than being SC of Texas <g>. Someone who
is working 3 jobs to try to make ends meet would have a little different
time constraints than someone who just won the lottery. I'm not sure
it's practical to try to determine how much work is too much for someone
else.

Angie



>-----Original Message-----
>
>Don't you think that would depend on the size of the state and
>the time that
>this person would have available?
>
>Jan
>
>----- Original Message -----
>
>> Do any of you think that a limit as to the number of states
>you can be SC
>of should put in place?
>>
>> I would think even 2 would too many if you were going to do
>an adequate
>job.
>>
>> Thanks, Vicki

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.500 / Virus Database: 298 - Release Date: 7/10/2003



==== BOARD Mailing List ====
Archives for Board-L are located at:
http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/board

This thread: