BOARD-L Archives

Archiver > BOARD > 2004-04 > 1080839253


From: "Don Kelly" <>
Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Logo
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 09:07:33 -0800
References: <10572149.1080838549865.JavaMail.root@grover.psp.pas.earthlink.net>


This makes good sense too. as I look at the present US outline logo, I am
impressed that there is too much detail in it. Detail is good if a logo is
quite large, but the details are kinda mushed in a small logo. I wonder what
the logo would look like if it had a bare red (or blue) outline (no detail),
very pale background, with USGenWeb overlay in red (or blue) blended with
white text.

Don
----- Original Message -----
From: "Denise Woodside" <>
To: <>
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Logo


> A suggestion that I received was to change the contest to updating the
current logo (due to new technology, etc.) rather than new logo. And AK and
HI could be brought in at that time too.
>
> Denise
> SE/MA CC rep
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: teri <>
> Sent: Apr 1, 2004 6:39 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Logo
>
> Yes. One Logo. The one we have now.
>
> Teri
> NE/NC CC rep
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Isaiah Harrison" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 1:50 AM
> Subject: [BOARD-L] Logo
>
>
> > As so many members of the AB voted yes on the previous motion,
indicating
> > they felt it was important that the AB determine "exactly how the
winning
> > logo will be chosen and whether or not it will become the only logo,"
you
> > will now have the opportunity to express exactly how you feel about this
> issue.
> >
> > In March, the number of members who bothered to express an opinion
(prior
> > to voting on the issue) was minimal. No member was willing to second a
> > motion presented on the issue, and no member was willing to present an
> > alternative motion on the issue. In April, perhaps it will be different.
> If
> > you can't deal with this issue, you'll never be able to deal with the
next
> > issue, which is even more complicated.
> >
> > It might be easier if the question were separated into its various
parts.
> > So, lets deal with one question at a time. First, separately from any
> other
> > consideration, should The USGenWeb Project have ONE logo (with
appropriate
> > variations) that should be displayed on every site associated with the
> project?
> >
> > Your response is invited. If you do not respond, it is assumed that you
> > agree there should be one logo for The USGenWeb Project that is required
> to
> > be displayed on all associated pages.
> >
> > -Isaiah
> >
> >
> > ==== BOARD Mailing List ====
> > "No man is good enough to govern another man without that other's
> consent."
> > Abraham Lincoln (1809 - 1865)
> >
>
>
> ==== BOARD Mailing List ====
> "No man is good enough to govern another man without that other's
consent."
> Abraham Lincoln (1809 - 1865)
>
>
>
> Denise Woodside
> ASC NCGenWeb
> CC Sampson County, NC & Shannon County, MO
>
>
> ==== BOARD Mailing List ====
> Want to know Who's Who in USGenWeb? Visit:
> http://www.usgenweb.com/about/whoswho-index.html
> To update your information, contact
>
>


This thread: