BOARD-L Archives

Archiver > BOARD > 2008-05 > 1210619184


From: "Alice Allen" <>
Subject: Re: [BOARD] Final Report of the USGenWeb Project Fact FindingCommittee
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 12:06:24 -0700
References: <796579.86050.qm@web52805.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <796579.86050.qm@web52805.mail.re2.yahoo.com>


I also echo Larry's" Thank You" to the committee for the work they did in researching this out.

Is it up to us perhaps, for the next step? The committee as I understand it, wasn't to make a recommendation for further action, but to present the facts, which they did with detail and clairty.

Alice

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

On 5/12/2008 at 10:53 AM Larry Flesher wrote:

>First, a giant THANK YOU to all members of this
>committee for their efforts in investigating these
>issues on behalf of the USGenWeb Project.
>
>It is not clear to me what the best 'next action'
>should be taken by the AB - is the committee
>suggesting that:
>
>A. The USGenWeb Project register itself as an
>"unincorporated nonprofit organization" in one of the
>eleven states which have adopted the UUNAA, thus
>receiving the benefits of such registration?
>
>B. The XXGenWeb Projects would also be included in
>this "unincorporated non-profit organization" if
>individually desired as 'sub-units' of the parent
>organization (even those residing in a state other
>than one of the eleven)?
>
>C. Or is A true and B false?
>
>Could someone please clarify for this old,slow mind?
>
>Larry Flesher
>SWSC SC Rep
>
>



This thread: