BOARD-L Archives

Archiver > BOARD > 2008-10 > 1225446575


From: "Sherri" <>
Subject: Re: [BOARD] Motion 2008/09-04: 'Webmaster Qualifications'
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:49:35 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1f42c6740810302107y164648ddi26b12c415f325f73@mail.gmail.com>


Concetta,

What you list as section 5 (d), below is completely different than what was
in the original. The original Section 5 (d) stated: "The webmaster and/or
assistant webmaster may be replaced for failure to comply with Sections 2
and 3, above."

Was it really your intention to amend this to read "The webmaster and
assistant webmaster will only be granted access to those portions of the
National site for which the Advisory Board have assigned them
responsibility."?

Sherri

-----Original Message-----
From: [mailto:] On
Behalf Of Concetta Phillipps
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 12:08 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [BOARD] Motion 2008/09-04: 'Webmaster Qualifications'

I would like to make a motion to amend by substitution Section 2 Article d
and Section 5 Article d:

Section 2 (d) to read:

(d) The individual must respond to requests for updates in a timely manner.
This is defined by responding to the request within 48 hours and completing
the requested update within one week unless the webmaster and/or assistant
have notified the Board that there are extenuating circumstances such as
unavailability due to vacation or illness, an intensive scope change, or
server outages. Under such circumstances an expected completion date must be
provided.

Section 5 (d) to read:

(d) The webmaster and assistant webmaster will only be granted access to
those portions of the National site for which the Advisory Board have
assigned them responsibility.

Concetta Phillipps
NENC CC Representative

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Tina S. Vickery
<>wrote:

> I have seen Board members post this to their regional lists and they
> have yet to come back with either discussion or "No discussion".
> There has also been suggested change(s) to this motion.
>
> If these changes are to be incorporated to this motion, the motion
> would have to be withdrawn and resubmitted with corrections; the
> motion could be the subject of an amendment by substitution; or the
> motion could be sent back to the committee for revision - which also
> takes it off the table.
>
> Tina Vickery
> National Coordinator
> USGenWeb Project
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike St. Clair/ST" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 2:51 AM
> Subject: Re: [BOARD] Motion 2008/09-04: 'Webmaster Qualifications'
>
>
> > Tina,
> >
> > It appears to me that discussion has run it's course on this. When
> > are you planning to call for the vote?
> >
> > Mike St. Clair
> >
> > Tina S. Vickery wrote:
> >> Motion 2008/09-04: 'Webmaster Qualifications'
> >>
> >> Presented by Sherri Bradley and seconded by Ann Allen Geoghegan,
> >> 'Webmaster Qualifications' dated October 27, 2008, is numbered
> >> Motion 2008/09-04.
> >>
> >> Motion reads:
> >>
> >> I move that the following webmaster qualifications and duties
> >> proposed
> by
> >> the Webmaster Study Group be approved and added to the Standard
> >> Rules of the USGenWeb Project.
> >>
> >> Sherri [Bradley]
> >>
> >> -----
> >>
> >> NATIONAL WEBSITE MAINTENANCE & WEBMASTER QUALIFICATIONS & DUTIES . . .
.
> >> . .
> >
> > USGenWeb Project information can be found at:
> > http://www.usgenweb.com
> > -------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes
> > in the subject and the body of the message
>
> USGenWeb Project information can be found at: http://www.usgenweb.com
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>
USGenWeb Project information can be found at: http://www.usgenweb.com
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in
the subject and the body of the message

This thread: