BOARD-L Archives
Archiver > BOARD > 2010-03 > 1269085603
From: "Sherri" <>
Subject: [BOARD] FW: Fw: MOTION 2009/10-22 Motion to Augment the GrievanceProcedures
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:46:43 -0400
Shared with permission. Thank you, Pat.
Sherri
-----Original Message-----
From: Pat Asher [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 9:23 AM
To:
Cc: Tina S. Vickery; Sherri
Subject: Re: [BOARD] Fw: MOTION 2009/10-22 Motion to Augment the Grievance
Procedures
At 04:52 AM 3/19/2010, Linda wrote:
>For every grievance filed there are 3 parties directly involved - the
>grievance filer, the accused, and the GC. The same standards apply to all -
>goose/gander. If it's zero tolerance for one, it is zero tolerance for all.
>'Case by case' aptly applies to all those who are not part of the three
>parties where some tolerance might be allowed.
>
>Finally in bullet 4 we address the third party involved. We define who = GC
>members, why = breach of confidentiality, corrective action to keep the
>grievance on track, but there is no consequence at all. It's ok.
Linda,
The penalty for GC Members is already specified in the existing
Grievance Procedures:
Section 1, Qualifications.
"Because grievances are considered personnel matters, all volunteers
must state that they are willing to abide by strict confidentiality
requirements. Volunteers must also state that they understand that
violation of this confidentiality agreement will mean immediate
expulsion from the Grievance Committee, and could result in
determination of Member Not in Good Standing by the Advisory Board. "
If the new consequences section specifies a penalty for GC Members,
then the existing Qualifications section will have to be changed to
reconcile with the new section.
Pat Asher
ARBenton CC
This thread: