BlackSheep-L Archives

From: Jeff Scism <>
Subject: Re: [BS-L] Polyandry
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 22:38:44 -0300

I replied to Ruth privately that the original conversation was specific
to the LDS and Reformed LDS, but that any Poligamous relationship in a
society that it was illegal was grounds for qualification. This isn't
LDS bashing, but they were the subject under discussion.

jeff


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Anticipate the future, live the present and remember the past.
Once this is mastered, all else will fall into place.

________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tag

This thread:

• Re: [BS-L] Polyandry by Jeff Scism <>
  • [BS-L] Polyandry by <>
  • Re: [BS-L] Polyandry by <>
  • Re: [BS-L] Polyandry by Jeff Scism <>
  • Re: [BS-L] Polyandry by Jeff Scism <>
  • Re: [BS-L] Polyandry by "jcurtis" <>

  • Re: [BS-L] Polyandry by Jeff Scism <>

  • Re: [BS-L] Polyandry by <>
  • Re: [BS-L] Polyandry by Jones, Ruth< >
  • Re: [BS-L] Polyandry by "jcurtis" <>