CFT-WIN-L Archives
Archiver > CFT-WIN > 2001-11 > 1005776604
From: "dick" <>
Subject: Re: [CFTW] html
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 14:23:24 -0800
References: <000101c16d52$94e58460$0501a8c0@JEBHP>
FTM ... and their "parent" company ( whoever it is today ) .... suck
bigtime
Bells & whistles ... and other tinsel garbage .. do NOT make a
genealogy program
Dick S.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jens E. (Mik) Brammer" <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 13:23
Subject: SV: [CFTW] html
> Where do I find a fair comparison between CFT V3.10 and FTM V9.0?
Two of my
> friends now have chosen FTM just because they have heard that it has
75% of
> the market in the world (or was it in the US - dosn't really
matter). I
> stick to CFT but have a hard time arguing for it over FTM which I
do not
This thread:
| Re: [CFTW] html by "dick" <> |