CRAWFORD-L Archives

From: "webmaster" <>
Subject: [CRAWFORD] Re: Crawford
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 18:49:54 GMT
References: <01cd01c19142$91fc88c0$2c977a3f@monkey>
In-Reply-To: <01cd01c19142$91fc88c0$2c977a3f@monkey>

Janet Ariciu writes:

> I was send the information on Crawford being my family. I add what send my
> to my webpage. Now need the documents to prove it. Can you help me
>
> www.geocities.com/janet_ariciu
>
> Janet
>


Hi Janet,
I have added your name, email address and web site to Sarah's page at the
Crawford webBase at:

http://www.cobnet.com/webBase/crawford/view.pl?INDI=1846

Hopefully, other researchers will be able to contact you through this link.

I find it interesting to see another variation on this Crawford Family Line.
It would be great if someone could help us all out with some sources for
this information.

I am forwarding a copy of your message to the Crawford Mailing List so that
others can see the new information that you have.

This family line is Sarah Crawford, daughter of David Crawford of New Kent,
Virginia. The main difference I run into is that you mention, David's
family line:

David,
father, John
father, Hugh
father, Thomas

while we currently have:

David,
father, John
father, John
father, Malcolm
father, Hugh

It would be nice to see sources here,
Mark

This thread:

• [CRAWFORD] Re: Crawford by "webmaster" <>