CRAWFORD-L Archives

From:
Subject: Re: [CRAWFORD] Re: Most Research Crawford Family Line
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 22:14:39 EST

I see major faults in the pedigree at the Crawford webBase Tree Page.
For one thing, some of the fathers & sons have the same birthdate.
And, for another thing, Sir Reginald, b. 1290, had a son b. 1391??
I don't think so.

~Virginia


wrote:

<< Hi Folks,

I am hoping to shed some lite on the information posted at the Crawford

webBase for a Family Line that is the most researched line we have.


Hopefully someone can jump in and correct me where I go wrong.


I am including the most recent message from Janet, so that you can follow

along.


The family line Janet is questioning about starts at David of New Kent, VA.


http://www.cobnet.com/webBase/crawford/tree.pl?407


The above link will take you to the family tree we are talking about and

hopefully will put us all on the same page. >>

This thread:

• [CRAWFORD] Re: Most Research Crawford Family Line by "webmaster" <>

  • Re: [CRAWFORD] Re: Most Research Crawford Family Line by

  • [CRAWFORD] Most Research Crawford Family Line (fwd) by "webmaster" <>
  • Re: [CRAWFORD] Most Research Crawford Family Line (fwd) by