DENEWCAS-L Archives

Archiver > DENEWCAS > 2001-05 > 0991136995


From: "Cathy Berger" <>
Subject: Re: KOCK/COOK, New Castle ca late 1600s
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 07:49:55 -0400
References: <3.0.6.32.20010517200951.00a31d10@lincoln.midcoast.com> <3.0.6.32.20010528165816.00a26ad0@lincoln.midcoast.com>


And I need to apologize for my previous message. I had Koch in my mind and
therefore went to Cock. On reading my books by Dr Craig i see that he feels
that Cock/Koch became Cox. Also, I do not remember ever seeing a Richard
among the Swedes and Finns of early Delaware. Please accept my apology.

Cathy
----- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: KOCK/COOK, New Castle ca late 1600s


> Cathy et al -
> A typo will get you into trouble every time. When the correct "Cock" is
> substituted for the incorrect "Cook", I believe my answer holds. But
> please check that for me, too. Your eyes are no doubt considerably
younger
> than mine.
> Isabel <>
>
> At 12:29 PM 05/28/2001 -0400, you wrote:
> >This is not accurate. Under Koch it says see Cock - and this WAS THE NAME
> >YOU ARE LOOKING FOR.
> >
> >CATHY
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: <>
> >To: <>
> >Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 8:09 PM
> >Subject: Re: KOCK/COOK, New Castle ca late 1600s
> >
> >
> >> At 08:19 AM 05/17/2001 -0700, Sharilyn Whitaker wrote:
> >> >Richard Kock AKA Cook and Margareta Van Norden had Joris, Maria,
> >> >Caecilia, Anna, Adam and John between 1716 and about 1725 or so.
> >> >I've been told that Dr. Peter Craig may have dealt with this
> >> >Kock family, in his book on "The 1693 Census of New Castle
> >> >County". Is anyone familiar with this book?
> >>
> >> Hi - I just checked the index of the book. The name "Kock" does not
> >> appear; and while there are some 60 "Cooks" listed, none of the names
you
> >> mention are included. I suspect the family may have come to the region
> >> later than the period of the book.
> >>
> >> Good luck! Isabel <>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>

This thread: