ENG-CAMBRIDGESHIRE-L Archives

Archiver > ENG-CAMBRIDGESHIRE > 2003-01 > 1043000249


From: "Bob Copeland" <>
Subject: Re: [ENG-CAMB] 1841 census
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 18:17:29 -0000
References: <051a01c2b30f$79c39f60$5d6736d2@yourpb64mrelfe> <3E156C30.000001.28019@tinypc> <011101c2bcb3$7a8ec520$6401a8c0@Laptop> <000b01c2bdb1$fa855ba0$464e01d5@treserver> <001a01c2bdbb$bbf49ea0$6401a8c0@Laptop>


Hi Paula

I have John Izzard in Litlington Census of 1851; H, Wr, 72, Ag Lab, b.Guilden Morden.

1851-72 = 1779.

Candidate = John Izzard baptised 5 July 1779 at Guilden Morden, son of John and Elizabeth (Nee Reynolds) - although there does not appear to be a burial entry, it looks as if John baptised on the same date in 1778 died.

John & Elizabeth appear to have had five children all at Guilden, John Snr being buried there in 1784.

I don't understand - "but he was alive and well in 1841 so he is not old John"

"> Then of course there is Mary daughter of John & Mary IZZARD baptised in
> 1778 - was this supposed to be daughter of Edward & Mary ?

I think so, John & Elizabeth are not likely to have produced another child between the two correct entries for Izzard at the time.

Regards,
Bob Copeland, Lincolnshire
Web http://www.btinternet.com/~robert_copeland/fhistory.html



----- Original Message -----
From: "Paula Patterson" <>
To: <>
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:02 AM
Subject: Re: [ENG-CAMB] 1841 census


> Thanks - I think I had most of the relationships but it's always good to
> have someone confirm them!
>
> Old John IZZARD in the 1851 census gives his place of birth as Guilden
> Morden around 1776
>
> IZZARDs who are candidates for his parents are:
> John & Elizabeth IZZARD (children baptised from 1775 onwards including John
> in 1778 - but he was alive and well in 1841 so he is not old John)
> James & Sarah IZZARD m 1779 ( had Hannah bap 1779 - they are a bit of a
> mystery - could have had a child before marriage - there are no more
> baptisms for them but there is a burial in 1803 in GM of a John son of
> ames - maybe they became non-conformist? )
> Edward & Elizabeth or Edward & Mary IZZARD - was there a child after Sarah?
> or did Edward and Mary have another child?
>
> Then of course there is Mary daughter of John & Mary IZZARD baptised in
> 1778 - was this supposed to be daughter of Edward & Mary ?
>
> Do you have any ideas where I should look next for the link between John
> IZZARD b ~1776 in GM and the rest of the family in GM at that time?
>

This thread: