ENG-DERBYSHIRE-CHESTERFIELD-L Archives

Archiver > ENG-DERBYSHIRE-CHESTERFIELD > 2004-10 > 1097962871


From: "A. Treweek" <>
Subject: Re: [Chesterfield] Researching FAREWELL HAVENHAND born 1860 Hackenthorpe Derby
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:41:11 +0000


Hello Mary
You wrote:

>Thanks for the latest on above family. Slight confusion here, because each
>census gives slightly different dates
>1861 shows SAM born 1826
>ELIZ. born1827 which ties up with childrens births.
>
>1881 shows
>SAM born 1833
>ELIZA born 1837.

There are two Samuels around. One has a wife named Elizabeth (yours) and the
other has a wife named Eliza.
1861 census RG9/3502 page 22b

HAVENHANDSamuel28DBYBeighton350222B
HAVENHANDEliza24DBYBeighton350222B
HAVENHANDAvarilda2DBYBeighton350222B
HAVENHANDHarriot Ann1DBYBeighton350222B
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This second Samuel and Eliza are on the 1881 census still at Hackenthorpe.

Samuel HAVERHAND Head M Male 48 Hackenthorpe, Derby, England
Sickle Maker (Ag Impl)
Eliza HAVERHAND Wife M Female 44 Hackenthorpe, Derby, England
Mary Ellen SENIOR Boarder Female 6 Hackenthorpe, Derby, England

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
They are still around in 1891 still in Beighton and the ages match.
HavenhandSam58HackenthorpRG12/3844461274
HavenhandEliza54HackenthorpRG12/3844461274

I have the 1881 census on disk and I can't find your Samuel and Elizabeth.

As for Thomas in 1901 it's not unusual for the ages to be 2-3 yrs out on the
census.It depends who gave the enumerator the information.

Hope this helps or is it another headache coming on (grin)
Angela


>I wonder which is correct? I guess we must go by 1861 as they are a family
>unit.
>THOMAS also appears 1861 as born 1853
> 1901 as born 1856
>As if I havent got enough queries! However, will hang onto all the info
>and
>maybe, will be able to unravel in due course.
>Mary
> >
> > They are still in Hackenthorpe in for the 1861 census, I only have the
> > index.
> > RG9/3502 folio 27b
> >
> > HAVENHAND Samuel 35 DBY Hackenthorpe 3502 27B
> > HAVENHAND Elizabeth 34 DBY Hackenthorpe 3502 27B
> > HAVENHAND Samuel 12 DBY Hackenthorpe 3502 27B
> > HAVENHAND Thomas 8 DBY Hackenthorpe 3502 27B
> > HAVENHAND Maryann 5 DBY Hackenthorpe 3502 27B
> > HAVENHAND Jane 3 DBY Hackenthorpe 3502 27B
> > HAVENHAND Farewell 1 DBY Hackenthorpe 3502 27B
> >
> > Kind Regards
> >
> > Angela (LEE) Eckington U.K.
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today!
> > http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
> >
> >
> > ==== ENG-DERBYSHIRE-CHESTERFIELD Mailing List ====
> > Check out the list's website for rules, guidelines, how to post to the
>list, view archives, unsubscribe, change from L to D or D to L:
> > http://www.connorsgenealogy.com/Chesterfield/
> >
> >
>
>
>==== ENG-DERBYSHIRE-CHESTERFIELD Mailing List ====
>Check out the list's website for rules, guidelines, how to post to the
>list, view archives, unsubscribe, change from L to D or D to L:
>http://www.connorsgenealogy.com/Chesterfield/
>

_________________________________________________________________
It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today!
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger

This thread: