ENG-SOMERSET-L Archives
Archiver > ENG-SOMERSET > 2003-06 > 1054920243
From: "AH" <>
Subject: Re: [ENG-SOM] WEBBER or WEBER
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 18:24:03 +0100
References: <01f901c32a06$19193a80$827e8751@computername> <001701c32a10$839db520$a00e01d5@preinstalledco> <001201c32ac2$aff2e8e0$e9f67ad5@computername> <000201c32b12$e6068ae0$8e1a57cb@ntpgqygv>
Thanks Keith, Grace has always been a pain in the proverbial!
Adrian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Wallwork" <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: [ENG-SOM] WEBBER or WEBER
> Hi Adrian
> I would take the place of birth given in the census with great suspicion.
I
> have found in many cases they put down where they are living at the time
of
> the census or where they thought they were born
> Keith in OZ
>
>
>
> ==== ENG-SOMERSET Mailing List ====
> Keep messages short and succinct. No postings about viruses or hoaxes,
flames, netiquette lessons,
> political or religious discussions. Violators may be unsubbed.
>
> ==============================
> To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records,
go to:
> http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237
>
This thread:
| Re: [ENG-SOM] WEBBER or WEBER by "AH" <> |