ESSEX-ROOTS-L Archives

From: "Bob Caulfield" <>
Subject: Re: HERRICK
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 1997 05:10:41 -0700

The Great Migration Begins, Vol II, pp913-914, has detailed comments on
Henry's parentage, including examinations as far back as 1937 on the claim
as to Sir Wm being his father. A letter dated 28 June 1653 from Henry to his
brother in Leicestershire has "demonstrated convincingly" that Henry was the
settler of that name in Virginia, distinct from the one in New England [TAG
14:96-98].
At this time, there appears to be no proof Henry's father is Sir William,
based on the latest evidence in writing.

Bob Caulfield...son of the Great Migration

-----Original Message-----
From: <>
To: <>
Date: Saturday, November 01, 1997 6:29 PM
Subject: HERRICK

>I am trying to prove/disprove, as many others are (!), the parentage of
Henry
>Herrick b1604 and married to Edith Laskin of Salem. Many believe that he is
>not the son of Sir William and Joan May. I have a document which may help
>solve the puzzle and wondered if anyone on this list has documentation of
>either Henry's middle name or middle initial?
>
>Please e-mail if you can help.
>
>Cheers!
>
>Valerie H. Burrows
>
>
>BURROWS,FLINT,FULLER,HERRICK, HODGKINS,LEACH,QUINN,WEEKS,
>WEST,WILKES,WOODBURY
>
>
>

This thread:

• HERRICK by <>

  • Re: HERRICK by "Bob Caulfield" <>

  • HERRICK by <>