ESSEX-UK-L Archives

Archiver > ESSEX-UK > 2000-08 > 0965283918


From: "David Lamb" <>
Subject: Re: South Hanningfield Baptisims 1829
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 07:25:18 +0100


Hi,

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Lewin <>
To: <>
Date: 02 August 2000 12:25
Subject: Re: South Hanningfield Baptisims 1829


>Hi,
>I had never thought until I read Greg's message, about the length of
signature blocks. I've now cut mine down a bit! I'm also going to try not
to send back the whole of messages I reply to. Another way we can perhaps
cut down on unnecessary mail is to remember that unsubscribe messages should
go to (or replace the L with a D if you are
in Digest mode), and not to the address for normal messages. Regards,
David Lamb Devon, UK
Interests: Essex: ALLISTON, BAXTER, BERRY, DODSON, GOLDSTONE, LAMB, SARGENT,
WEBB, WILLSHER
Suffolk: BERRY, HUMPHRY, FINCH Sussex: RALPH
>
>Greg wrote: The South Hanningfield messages were numerous but small. They
contained
>information relevant to the list and were not bloated with large
>signature blocks. The total bandwidth used was probably less than is
>wasted on the average day by automatic full-quotation of the messages to
>which we are replying.
>


This thread: