FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS-L Archives

From: "John Lockley" <>
Subject: Fw: [FHU]
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 19:52:46 -0000

Patrick,
I'd find this useful too. More than one case of an illegitimate child
subsequently fostered by grandparents leads to some very confusing apparent
descent lines.
Kind regards,
John Lockley


----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Cracroft-Brennan" <>
To: <>
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 7:28 PM
Subject: [FHU]


> Is there any way in FH that mistresses and illegitimate offspring can be
> shown as such as opposed to wives and legitimate offspring? I am thinking
> of something like the wavy lines that are often seen in printed pedigrees
> to
> denote an illegitimate line.
>
>
>
> Patrick Cracroft-Brennan
>
> Director - Cracroft's Peerage Limited
>
>
>
> This e-mail (and any attachment it may contain) is confidential and
> privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the
> addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment
> may
> be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to
> this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If
> you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender
> immediately
> by return e-mail, and delete this message. Heraldic Media Ltd., Cracroft's
> Peerage Ltd, Bambury & Co, their subsidiaries and/or employees, shall not
> be
> liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any
> attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Any opinions
> expressed in this message are those of the author only and do not
> necessarily represent the views of Heraldic Media Ltd, Cracroft's Peerage
> Ltd or Bambury & Co.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ==============================
> View and search Historical Newspapers. Read about your ancestors, find
> marriage announcements and more. Learn more:
> http://www.ancestry.com/s13969/rd.ashx
>
>

This thread:

• Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 19:28:17 -0000 by "Patrick Cracroft-Brennan" <>