FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS-L Archives

Archiver > FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS > 2007-01 > 1168592637


From: "Andrew Jolly" <>
Subject: Re: [FHU] Copy/paste citation is not broken
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:03:57 -0000
In-Reply-To: <00db01c73627$7265b100$0400a8c0@WHITE5>


Read most of these but not commented before, but I would expect copy and
paste to paste what was originally copied, not a later update.

Andrew

-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:] On Behalf Of Alan E.
White
Sent: 12 January 2007 08:56
To:
Subject: Re: [FHU] Copy/paste citation is not broken


A week after the last posting on this subject seems to be an appropriate
time to summarise.

I know that this isn't a democracy, and that this list isn't necessarily
representative of all FH users but I hope that Calico Pie would want to use
the comments on this list to gauge opinion.

This is my interpretation of the comments:
In favour of the v3.0 method: 4
Ambivalent: 1
In favour of the v3.1 method: 0

That doesn't look to be a ringing endorsement of the change. Can we have a
statement from Calico Pie on the future of this issue?

Alan


-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
with the word 'unsubscribe'
without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.410 / Virus Database: 268.16.9/622 - Release Date: 10/01/2007
14:52


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.410 / Virus Database: 268.16.9/622 - Release Date: 10/01/2007
14:52


This thread: