FITZRANDOLPH-L Archives

Archiver > FITZRANDOLPH > 2000-03 > 0953343677


From: Marian Cranford <>
Subject: Re: [FR] Re: vote on it
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 19:41:17 -0600


I agree - #1 is my choice for all the reasons stated so far - especially
that: 1) I don't want to miss that one tiny bit of info that ight solve my
brick wall, and 2) I enjoy getting to know all my great f.r. cousins!
Thanks John for a great list. Marian

At 02:33 PM 3/17/00 EST, you wrote:
>
>In a message dated 3/17/00 2:19:27 PM, writes:
>
><< bottom line I would rather open and delete 100 messages for every good
one
>than risk missing the one bit of information I've spent years looking for.
>>
>
>AMEN to this and the other reasons for opting for #1, which is my vote
also.
>Any one can reply to the individual sender NOW if he or she wishes to and is
>aware that it is possible to do so. It simply means that instead of simply
>hitting the REPLY (or after doing so) pasting in the addy of the specific
>person who addressed the issue to which you are replying.
>
>I don't think anyone here isn't capable of that. I am on other lists as
>well, not just genealogy, and some of them do descend to kaffe-klatsch
>sometimes and such a reminder usually tidies things up for a while.
>
>Count me in for #1.
>
>Lurking about for Good Old Days
>
>Jan Williams
>
>
>==== FITZRANDOLPH Mailing List ====
>Please do not send attachments to the List.
>Please do not send attachments to the List.
>They act like spam and overload the server.
>Just tell us what you have so we can request it privately.
>
>==============================
>The RootsWeb WorldConnect Project:
>Tens of millions of individuals... and counting.
>http://worldconnect.genealogy.rootsweb.com/
>
>

This thread: