FREEBMD-DISCUSS-L ArchivesArchiver > FREEBMD-DISCUSS > 2002-07 > 1027350134
From: Ben Laurie <>
Subject: Re: Additional data
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 16:08:47 +0100
References: <3D39680B.firstname.lastname@example.org> <3D3AB043.email@example.com> <3D3AC6BB.firstname.lastname@example.org> <3D3ACE98.email@example.com> <3D3AED0C.firstname.lastname@example.org> <3D3AF57C.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Catherine Prescott wrote:
> Historical facts cannot be copyrighted, so the data contained on the
> certificate is not copyright.
Certainly this sounds reasonable.
> However the form of presentation of the data can be copyrighted, so you
> would need permission eg to reproduce an image of the certificate.
Well, that's OK, because that's not what's being proposed.
> For this reason, FreeBMD needs permission to reproduce the GRO indexes
> (including GRO reference numbers) and has only obtained it for those over
> 100 years old. But interestingly no permission would be needed to reproduce
> a more comprehensive database of historic BMD information whether obtained
> from the certificates, the indexes, or elsewhere.
In fact it is our view that the new Crown Copyright policies mean that
we need no permission for FreeBMD.
"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff