FTM-TECH-L Archives

From: BJ <>
Subject: Re: [FTM-TECH] Individuals and File Sizes
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 01:43:09 -0700
References: <d48.1061b5f2.340b75c3@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <d48.1061b5f2.340b75c3@aol.com>

Thanks for the information on the file size. I guess 36 mb isn't such a
large file after all. Mine is over 85mb for only 2400+ individuals but
I have some rather large pictures. I can see where extensive notes and
to some degree, extensive source/citations could increase the file size.

BJ

wrote:
>
> In a message dated 9/1/2007 10:08:32 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> writes:
>
> wrote:
> Have you compacted your file in FTM 16? 35.77 mb seems like an awfully big
> file without pictures. Any one else have a lot of individuals in your file?
> What is the size in mb and do you have pictures inside the file?
>
>
>
> Mine is 55.22 MB no pictures 10,910 individuals
>
>

This thread:

• Re: [FTM-TECH] Flaptop reply to BJ was Linda G has a good point by <>
  • Re: [FTM-TECH] Flaptop reply to BJ was Linda G has a good point by "John Okerson" <>
    • Re: [FTM-TECH] Flaptop reply to BJ was Linda G has a good point by gwalz <>
  • Re: [FTM-TECH] Flaptop reply to BJ was Linda G has a good point by "Glenwood E. Robinson" <>
  • [FTM-TECH] Individuals and File Sizes by Bill Lewis <>
    • Re: [FTM-TECH] Individuals and File Sizes by

      • Re: [FTM-TECH] Individuals and File Sizes by BJ <>

      • Re: [FTM-TECH] Individuals and File Sizes by "Peggy Ann Vipond" <>
  • [FTM-TECH] Flaptop reply to BJ was Linda G has a good point by "Sue A" <>