FreeBMD-Admins-L Archives
Archiver > FreeBMD-Admins > 1998-09 > 0906216890
From: Ben Laurie <>
Subject: Re: Dismal failure
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 15:54:50 +0100
Camilla von Massenbach wrote:
> Graham said:
> > Ben Laurie wrote:
> > > Non-techies may struggle with the complete scheme, but surely we can
> > > have the simplified version (use a * for any characters you are unsure
> > > about) for them? The snag with simply marking the whole record, it seems
> > > to me, is that you then aren't giving any clue at all of what you aren't
> > > sure about - and worse, you aren't allowing appropriate matching for
> > > people doing queries. Even if we hide this stuff from (most) users, it
> > > seems to me we should have it in the underlying system.
> >
> > Ok, no problem with that.. We can still throw them into a separate
> > table as well as the main one so people can go and check them for us ..
> > or have a field in the main table so we can search on it ..
>
> Is this the same thing as producing a report when we want of things to be
> checked?
Yep!
Cheers,
Ben.
--
Ben Laurie |Phone: +44 (181) 735 0686| Apache Group member
Freelance Consultant |Fax: +44 (181) 735 0689|http://www.apache.org/
and Technical Director|Email: |
A.L. Digital Ltd, |Apache-SSL author http://www.apache-ssl.org/
London, England. |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache/
WE'RE RECRUITING! http://www.aldigital.co.u
This thread:
| Re: Dismal failure by Ben Laurie <> |