FreeBMD-Admins-L Archives

Archiver > FreeBMD-Admins > 2006-08 > 1154516287


From: Tony <>
Subject: Re[2]: WinBMD Ver. 5 Problem??
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 20:58:07 +1000
References: <1462252410.20060802150525@one-name.org> <44D042FC.7090107@ntlworld.com>
In-Reply-To: <44D042FC.7090107@ntlworld.com>


Hi Phil,

I have overcome the problem via "File Management"

But,the strange element is that WinBMD Ver5 would not allow to enter
an alternative ,6c as I would normally have do.

Thanks for your contribution :o)

Wednesday, August 2, 2006, 4:15:24 PM, you wrote:

> I believe that Dudley, along with Bridport, Poole and Sturminster have
> been deliberately disabled as they changed districts at inconvenient
> (for WinBMD) times. The solution is to change what WinBMD offers you to
> 6c and then answer Yes to have it added to your supplementary districts
> list. For more information go to the Syndicates mailing list and click
> on the link "Advance notice of a few changes in the "standard district"
> list" in the July 2006 archive.

> Phil

> ______________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by Netintelligence
> http://www.netintelligence.com/email



--
Regards,
Tony mailto:


This thread: