FreeBMD-Admins-L ArchivesArchiver > FreeBMD-Admins > 2007-09 > 1190786058
From: "l.t.b" <>
Subject: RE: More on crossed out numbers
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:54:18 +0100
Thanks Jeff, I will do this in future.
[mailto:] On Behalf Of Jeff Coleman
Sent: 25 September 2007 22:51
Subject: Re: More on crossed out numbers
For what it is worth the advice I give to my syndicate is to follow the
advice of both TKB 6g and 6z at http://www.freebmd.org.uk/vol_faq.html#6g
and further down the page.
i.e. put in both entries and after the first add
#COMMENT entry crossed through
after the first one
We have seen a few cases where the two versions are not identical, and some
where in addition a page number is altered in a similar typed line, where
TKB 6d comes into play.
----- Original Message -----
From: "l.t.b" <>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 1:10 PM
Subject: More on crossed out numbers
>I believe there was an earlier thread about crossed out entries but I'm not
> sure this was quite the same as my query or if the answer to question 6d
> For instance, in file
> 181.jpg there are two identical handwritten lines at the bottom of the
> page, with one crossed through. This is different to when there is a
> out entry *within* the body of the page, with a handwritten correction at
> the bottom, as opposed to handwritten *additions* one of which is crossed
> through. I hope that makes sense!
> Is it correct to just add one line, in the marked position or should we
> both lines, then a COMMENT to say that one has been ruled through?
FreeBMD-Admins mailing list - archive
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message