FreeBMD-Admins-L Archives

Archiver > FreeBMD-Admins > 2009-03 > 1236472028


From: "Allan Raymond" <>
Subject: Re: 1934 B4 Page 321 Letter S
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 00:27:08 -0000
References: <4455025A92A54283876CBD8BACF92307@toshibauser>
In-Reply-To: <4455025A92A54283876CBD8BACF92307@toshibauser>


It's telling you to insert the out of sequence entry Spouge, Rheva into the
correct sequence further down the page just under entry Spouge, Patricia A.

There's no necessity to insert a #COMMENT (rather than a THEORY) to explain
the move of the entry.

Allan Raymond


----- Original Message -----
From: "Carol Haycock" <>
To: <>
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 11:59 PM
Subject: 1934 B4 Page 321 Letter S


This is one I haven't seen before. It is a typed scan and very easy to
read.

The surnames SPONG, Shirley and SPOUGE, Rheva follow each other with the
latter seemingly out of order. There is an X with dots around it the space
between SPONG and SPOUGE with no comment. I had inserted a #THEORY after
SPONG saying I believe the following name should be SPONGE, Rheva.

However, now I get down to SPOUGE, Patricia, and find the X with surrounding
dots there as well in the space before the following name SPOUR--again with
no comments. I now question what I wrote in the first #THEORY.

And do I ignore this X and dots since there is no comment or should I put in
a #THEORY that the following name should be SPOUGE, Rheva?

Help please,

Carol Haycock No 609
FreeBMD-Admins mailing list - archive
http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/freebmd-admins
FreeBMD http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/

-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message


This thread: