GAELBERT-L Archives

From: LS <>
Subject: Re: [GAELBERT] List Settings
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 23:07:33 -0700
References: <40A2127C.000001.01256@JIM> <40A212CC.000004.01256@JIM> <003f01c43825$5b6e09a0$5e02a8c0@Belkin>
In-Reply-To: <003f01c43825$5b6e09a0$5e02a8c0@Belkin>

Thanks Jeanne! Look at all the action...it's great!

Luana
P.S. "Every" inquiry is not going to apply to "everyone" on any list.
One can always unsubscribe if they don't like the action. In addition
there's always the "delete" option. Smiles.....

Jeanne Arguelles wrote:

>Yes, I am the list administrator. I changed the reply setting a few years
>back, at the request of several listmembers who were complaining about the
>amount of mail. Since that no longer seems to be a concern, I have changed
>it back to reply-to-list. It's nice to see some activity on the list!
>
>Jeanne Arguelles
>
>
>
>
>
>>-------Original Message-------
>>
>>From: jim gilmer
>>Date: 05/12/04 07:03:08
>>To:
>>Subject: Re: [GAELBERT] Thanks to Robert Johnston
>>
>>
>>You folks must be right about the inactivity on the list. I've wondered
>>
>>
>why
>
>
>>the "reply" was incorrectly set, too. Now, though, I'm wondering if we
>>
>>
>have
>
>
>>a List Administrator for this site?
>>
>>Jim
>>
>>-------Original Message-------
>>
>>From: LS
>>Date: 05/12/04 06:12:25
>>To:
>>Subject: [GAELBERT] Thanks to Robert Johnston
>>
>>I just want to give my thanks to Robert for initiating a roll call which
>>has managed to liven up this list. I was forever wondering if there was
>>anyone subscribed to this list besides me and his post for a roll call
>>has brought this list alive again....at least for now.
>>
>>Some lists explicitly forbid "roll calls", but since the list
>>Administrator here has not stepped in to stop it....I guess it's ok.
>>
>>Luana
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>

This thread:

• Re: [GAELBERT] List Settings by "Jeanne Arguelles" <>
  • Re: [GAELBERT] List Settings by "jim gilmer" <>

  • Re: [GAELBERT] List Settings by LS <>