RootsWeb: GEN-BENELUX-L Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan

GEN-BENELUX-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-BENELUX > 2008-11 > 1226707876

From: Richard van Schaik <>
Subject: Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 01:11:16 +0100
References: <491ccf0f$0$903$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr><79daa$491db26e$50388a2b$2435@news.chello.nl><2110e$491dc451$5ed11eac$30056@cache4.tilbu1.nb.home.nl>
In-Reply-To: <2110e$491dc451$5ed11eac$30056@cache4.tilbu1.nb.home.nl>

Ik zie sommigen posten dat ze niet erg actief zijn in deze groep. Ik denk niet dat het over actief zijn gaat, maar over relevante antwoorden. Ik ken er b.v. die relevant antwoorden maar toch niet vaak posten. Ik wil hier niemand aanspreken, dus maar een antwoord op eigen bericht. Groeten, Richard -- Richard van Schaik http://www.fmavanschaik.nl/ Mail address changed repair to this on my site is being worked on

This thread:

[GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by Pieter <>

Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by "Albert Mesman" <>

Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by "Eric van der Ent" <>

Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by "Daan" <>

Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by Richard van Schaik <>

Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by -- hans -- <>
- Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by Richard Keijzer <>
  - Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by "Ine van den Munckhof" <>
  - Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by "Piet Molema" <>

Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by Richard van Schaik <>

Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by "wim sels" <>
- Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by "Rob Hubert" <>

Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by "H.Hoeksema Dzn." <>
- Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by Henry <>
- Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by Frans Vandenbrink <>

Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by "F.C.J. $Frans$ van Baaren" <>

Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by "Johan Berteloot" <>

Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by Frank Steggink <>
- Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by Richard Keijzer <>
  - Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by "dKl" <>
  - Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by <>
    - Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by "Ine van den Munckhof" <>
  - Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by Kees Dommisse <>
    - Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by "Joop Renkers" <>
      - Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by Kees Dommisse <>
    - Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by "Cor Henzen" <>
  - Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by Hetty Kroes <>
  - Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by "Joop Renkers" <>
    - Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by Pé <>
      - Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by "Katzy" <>
        Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by "Joop Renkers" <>
        Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by Frank Steggink <>
        Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by Robert Jan van Houten <>
        Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by Frank Steggink <>
    - Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by Richard Keijzer <>
      - [GEN-BENELUX] Gelukkig toch (was: Re: jammer dan) by Richard van Schaik <>
        Re: [GEN-BENELUX] Gelukkig toch by Jan Lafeber <>
        Re: [GEN-BENELUX] Gelukkig toch by Pieter <>

Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by Richard Keijzer <>

Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by "willie" <>
- Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by <>

[GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by "Willemine J. Lieuwes" <>

Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by "Rob Hubert" <>

Re: [GEN-BENELUX] jammer dan by "marrip" <>