GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 1998-10 > 0907265099


From: <>
Subject: Our Personal Line
Date: 1 Oct 1998 11:04:59 -0700


I'm a new subscriber on both these lists, and I'm hitting up both of them in
case someone can provide the info that I'm looking for.

First off, here's the line in question:

Direct Descendants of JOHN of Gaunt

1 JOHN of Gauntb: March 1339/40 in Bavon Abbey, Ghent, Flanders,
Belgiumd: February 03, 1398/99 in Leicester Castle, London, England
*Partner of JOHN of Gaunt:
*2nd Wife of JOHN of Gaunt:
*3rd Wife of JOHN of Gaunt:
.+Katherine DE ROETb: 1350d: 1403m: January 13, 1395/96 in Lincoln,
Lincolnshire, EnglandFather: Paon (Payne) de ROET
..2 Joan BEAUFORTb: 1379 in Kettlethorpe, Lincolnshire, Englandd:
November 13, 1440 in Howden, Yorkshire, England
..*2nd Husband of Joan BEAUFORT:
......+Ralph NEVILLEb: 1364 in Raby, Durham, Englandd: October 21, 1425 in
Raby Castle, Durham, Englandm: Bef. February 20, 1396/97 in EnglandFather:
John NEVILLE
.......3 George NEVILLEb: Abt. 1407 in England
...........+Elizabeth BEAUCHAMP
............4 Henry NEVILLEb: Abt. 1433 in England
................+Joan BOURCHIER
.................5 Richard NEVILLEb: Abt. 1467 in England
.....................+Anne STAFFORDb: Unknown in Englandd: Unknown in
Englandm: 1490 in EnglandFather: Humphrey STAFFORD, Jr., of GraftonMother:
Eleanor AYLESBURY
......................6 Susanna NEVILLEb: Abt. 1501 in England
..........................+Richard NORTON
...........................7 Clare NORTON
...............................+Richard GOODRICK
................................8 Margaret GOODRICKb: Abt. 1560 in
Englandd: September 1598 in Kippax, Yorkshire, England
....................................+Francis George BAILDONb: 1560 in
Kippax, Yorkshire, Englandd: June 14, 1622 in Monk Fryston, Yorkshire,
Englandm: Abt. 1588 in England
.....................................9 Richard BELDENb: 1591 in Englandd:
August 22, 1655 in CT

Has anyone out there the missing dates and places for these people? The
resources that I have don't give the Neville line down as far as Susanna, and
they don't include the Norton line.

The Nortons bring up another question. As I saw the line posted somewhere, the
name would have been "Conyers" had not the child of a male Conyers and a
female Norton called himself "Conyers-Norton." A succeeding generation dropped
the "Conyers" designation and simply called himself "Norton," although the
patrilineal line would have been "Conyers," as I understand it. Can someone
shed some light on that business?

Thanx for any help you can give--

Doris Stanford

This thread: