GEN-MEDIEVAL-L ArchivesArchiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2000-01 > 0947105813
From: "Yvette P. Hoitink" <>
Subject: Re: Reliability of Hull royalty database and WW-Person
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2000 20:56:53 GMT
Thanks a lot Paul, having some simple tests to check out the reliability is
a very good idea. Since my only references so far were these online
databases, I haven't been able to come up with good tests myself.
One question, though, do you have another link for Jim Stevens 's genealogy
website? The link:
http://www.gendex.com/users/jast/index.html you gave in your reply doesn't
seem to work.
<> wrote in message news:email@example.com...
> In article <Ftjc4.2603$>,
> "Yvette P. Hoitink" <> wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> > Ever since I stumbled on some royal ancestors, I have been making
> great use
> > of the Directory of Royal Genealogical Data at the university of Hull,
> > UK(http://www.dcs.hull.ac.uk/public/genealogy/royal/catalog.html) and
> > WW-Person, the database with Charlemagne descendants
> > (http://www8.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/html/ww-person.html) at the
> > university of Erlangen, Germany.
> > Can anyone tell me how reliable these sources are? Since they do not
> > their sources for each person, I find them hard to check.
> > Yvette Hoitink
> > E-mail:
> > WWW: http://www.twente.nl/~genealogy
> > Important question.
> Error is human. Every scholar is (relatively) learned for a country, a
> dinasty, an epoch and (relatively) ignorant for the rest.
> About websites, I think it' s possible to test.
> My favourite tests of reliability:
> About France and capetians:
> Test 1) the father of Constance of Provence, m. Robert II "the pious" of
> Good : William of Provence, or Arles
> Bad : William Taillefer of Toulouse
> Test 2) the mother of Hugh Capet
> Good : Edwige (Hathui) of Saxonia, d. of Henry the fowler
> Bad: An anglo-saxon princess
> Test 3) Accurate roman connection for capetians
> "Robert, count of Worms"'s level is safety
> About Carolingians:
> Test 1) ancestry for early Pepinids (Arnulf, Doda, Pepin and Itta)
> A website with an ancestry without reserve for these characters
> is "dangerous".
> For global research:
> Test 1) Descent from Adam and Eva
> It's funny; no more, no less
> Test 2) accurate merovingian or wisigothic origins without conditional
> and very cautious footnote advertising theses lines are unproved and
> 1) The important: References and sources for every fact (not
> bibliogrphy; serious notes)
> 2) Scholars: genealogists want to know the historical truth (only the
> truth) by serious academics and scholars, using genealogy as an auxiliar
> science of History.
> If the genealogy you work on is good for you, it's good too for
> historians (and even for unversitary books), vice versa..
> The best website I know :
> Jim Stevens 's genealogy website
> Easy, useful and agreeable (and cautious).
> Evidently, nobody's perfect, but it's the only website cautiously
> annoted I know.
> It's my favourite reference, and I think we need a reference website.
> J. Stevens wrote in his website:
> "Documentation. As a new researcher years ago, I had no idea of the
> importance of documenting the sources for my
> links. This led to numerous headaches later in my research
> experience. As a result, I have become fanatical about citing
> sources. I have invested countless hours in going back through my
> work and documenting each individual link (not just
> the whole line) whenever possible. This allows you to more
> accurately judge the reliability of a link in my genealogy. If
> there is no source cited, accept the link only with careful
> reservation !"
> I agree.
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
|Re: Reliability of Hull royalty database and WW-Person by "Yvette P. Hoitink" <>|