GEN-MEDIEVAL-L ArchivesArchiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2000-01 > 0948739159
From: "THERON L. SMITH" <>
Subject: RE: SPENCER-CHURCHILL
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 12:39:19 -0600
I wanted to add one more point, maybe already obvious to every one.
Sir Winston's PATRILINEAL line was SPENCER not CHURCHILL. So assuming no
irregularities in their respective descents, he and Diana's father (Earl
John Spencer) and her brother should all have copies of the same
> -----Original Message-----
> From:Killian" de Ros [SMTP:]
> Sent:Sunday, January 23, 2000 6:28 PM
> Subject:RE: SPENCER-CHURCHILL
> The Churchill name was added to the Spencer name By George to honor his
> grandmother, heir to Marlborough. She willed the Title to him. So the
> name "Spencer Churchill" came into being. The names are not combined
> for ex.,(SPENCER-CHURCHILL), but every offspring has it spelled the
> same way, Spencer Churchill.
> So they are as much of Spencer as they are Churchill. Hope that makes
> sense...kind of confusing.
> Hello, Theron nice to see your posts once more. You helped with my
> Washington, Spencer lines last year. Hoped you had a better year than I.
> Killian de Ros
> aka K Ellis
> Houston, Texas
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.