GEN-MEDIEVAL-L ArchivesArchiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2000-02 > 0950852737
From: raymond l montgomery <>
Subject: Re: OT-Sally Hemings
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 22:45:37 -0700
I dont think that any one here has said diffinatively that it is a proven
How ever the statistical probablity is extremely high. Is that how you
Or do you have a problem with that. there are some facts that have not
been presented that should be considered. 1. is that many of the slave
owners had relations with there slaves! In fact if was frowned on for any
one else to have a relationship with a slave with out the owners
permission as that slave was his property and any one else could be held
does that help to firm up some of this as a extremely high fact for you!
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000 19:27:25 -0800 Kirk & Susan Jenkins
>I strongly disagree with several of the posts which seem to
>regard this purported relationship as a proven fact. It is
>not. And the newspaper articles of James Callender hardly
>constitute reputable historical evidence of anything.
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
|Re: OT-Sally Hemings by raymond l montgomery <>|