GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

From: A Channing <>
Subject: Re: Digest Numbering
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 19:19:47 -0500

>
> A Channing wrote:
> >
> > I note that the numbering of digest posts has tripped at Vol 01 No 53,
the
> > next being Vol 01 No 4, then in sequence from 4. Not that it matters
to
> > me, but there would be a problem with anyone trying to retrieve the
early
> > 2001 digests from archives.
>
> The digests may arrive out of numerical order because of the RootsWeb
> server problem. For a while I was missing some of the early numbers in
> Vol 01, but I have now received those.
>
> -- Don Stone
>

Sorry, I may not have expressed myself very well.

The current numbers (around Vol 01 No 10) have already been used this
month, as have all up to 53. Somehow what should have been no 54 has been
renumbered no 04, what should have been 55 came through as 05 etc, ie all
numbers 04 to 53 will be duplicated unless corrected.

Adrian

This thread:

• Digest Numbering by A Channing <>
  • Re: Digest Numbering by Don Stone <>

  • Re: Digest Numbering by A Channing <>

    • Re: Digest Numbering by Don Stone <>