GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

From: (Gryphon801)
Subject: Re: CROWMER-FIENNES c. 1450
Date: 16 Mar 2001 19:34:11 GMT
References: <gilmore-ED91CB.10393316032001@News>

I am sure that such matters would not have been mentioned in the presence of a
lady by officers and gentlemen - as you say, excluding a certain person whom we
know who is neither.

This thread:

• CROWMER-FIENNES c. 1450 by Larry Coats <>
  • Re: CROWMER-FIENNES c. 1450 by "Leo van de Pas" <>
  • Re: CROWMER-FIENNES c. 1450 by "Douglas Richardson" <>
    • Re: CROWMER-FIENNES c. 1450 by "Douglas Richardson" <>
  • Re: CROWMER-FIENNES c. 1450 by "John Steele Gordon" <>
  • RE: CROWMER-FIENNES c. 1450 by "p.sutton" <>
    • Re: CROWMER-FIENNES c. 1450 by "D. Spencer Hines" <>
      • Re: CROWMER-FIENNES c. 1450 by Paul J Gans <>
        • Re: CROWMER-FIENNES c. 1450 by "D. Spencer Hines" <>
        • Re: CROWMER-FIENNES c. 1450 by Phyllis Gilmore <>

          • Re: CROWMER-FIENNES c. 1450 by (Gryphon801)

          • Re: CROWMER-FIENNES c. 1450 by (Mike Dana)
            • Re: CROWMER-FIENNES c. 1450 by "D. Spencer Hines" <>
              • Re: CROWMER-FIENNES c. 1450 by "MARTIN REBOUL" <>
            • (OT) Pogue {Was Re: CROWMER-FIENNES c. 1450} by Ed Mann <>
              • Re: Pogey bait by "Richard Smyth" <>
                • Re: Pogey bait by "Todd A. Farmerie" <>
                  • Re: Pogey bait by "D. Spencer Hines" <>
  • RE: CROWMER-FIENNES c. 1450 by Roz Griston <>
    • Re: CROWMER-FIENNES c. 1450 by "P A MagLOCHLAINN" <>
  • RE: CROWMER-FIENNES c. 1450/ Pogue by Roz Griston <>