GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives
Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2001-04 > 0987087277
From:
Subject: Re: Tomlinson, Elizabeth: Estate of
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 10:54:37 EDT
Paul, you are missing the point entirely because your mind is made up. This
conversation is practically useless at this point because you are not reading
my posts and understanding them.
There is another court case entirely before the 1635 case that went to court
in 1631. This is the case I am talking about. The first court action
involving this will of Elizabeth Tomlinson took place in 1631. In this
court record, the admininistrator was not Edward Bagley but two of Elizabeth
Tominlinson's sons-in-law, Thomas Duddley and Henry Jevon (husbands of her
illegitimte daughters). These men were called 'administrators' in court --
although they, like Edward later, were defendants in a suit brought by Dud
Dudley. The question is how can they be legal administrators and more than
Edward Bagley?
In a message dated 4/11/01 12:25:29 PM, writes:
<< Ken, I don't know how you can be ignorant of even general knowledge
concerning
probate procedure and law, professing errant opinions as if they were fact,
telling us to adjust to your misinterpretations (not even seeing the actual
documents), and then be so opinionated in demanding that we change our
conclusions based on speculation. Amazin >>
This thread:
| Re: Tomlinson, Elizabeth: Estate of by |