GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives
Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2001-05 > 0990468537
From: "Todd A. Farmerie" <>
Subject: Re: the conqueror's companion lists
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 12:08:57 -0600
References: <01c0e1f9$6cd86080$LocalHost@fti/62hzcyc>
Annie Natalelli-Waloszek wrote:
>
> What, you mean that a guy goes off to put William on the throne of a foreign
> country, they pull it off, his family isn't provided for if he's killed?
Engenulf L'Aigle's family doesn't appear to have derived very
much benefit from his death.
> Surely would lessen the number of volonteers...
volunterrs? It was their feudal responsibility.
> intellectual snobbery aside, common sense generally works;
One snide remark.
> think, Renia, think...
Two.
> Just because you didn't think of it yourself, doesn't mean it's not
> obvious...
Three. Can you post without being insulting (or claiming
victimhood)?
> why would Wm have gone
> to the trouble to compile a Domesday Book, if he didn't value writings
> enough to know how to read some?
Because he wanted to collect taxes.
taf
This thread:
| Re: the conqueror's companion lists by "Todd A. Farmerie" <> |