GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2001-06 > 0991882133


From: Roz Griston <>
Subject: RE: Is Leo an innocent?
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 19:48:53 -0700


this is getting boring leo. i've better things to do with my life than
spoon feed you information. try reading the archives with an objective
view, rather than subjective.

you sparked off annie..played with her for a while..then attempted to
back off when you had infuriated..she finally dropped it..and you could
not let it go..bringing it back to the forefront..with your term
anniemals..as a description for anyone speaks out of turn (in your
opinion)

btw..what happened to the OT label?
oh hell..lets get back to genealogy. i'm bored with this thread.
roz

-----Original Message-----
From:Leo van de Pas [SMTP:]
Sent:Wednesday, June 06, 2001 5:40 PM
To:Roz Griston;
Subject:Re: Is Leo an innocent?


----- Original Message -----
From: Roz Griston <>
To: <>
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 12:45 AM
Subject: OT: Is Leo an innocent?


> Methinks Leo doth protest too much.

Am I? I am asking you to justifiy your vicious attack. You still
haven't.
The message you reacted to was a heading with several negative headings
THE
MESSAGE was a request to stop about these. Is that an attack? You
cannot
admit that you misread the message. I stopped my communications with
Annie,
but Annie continued to make snide remarks, like you are. Admit that
that you
made a mistake, don't dig yourself in deeper.
Leo van de Pas


> check out the gen-medieval archives
> year - 2001
> keywords in the search: annie leo
> 92 hits
>
> use your find in page feature. keyword: leo
>
> subject lines:
> Now what?
> I don't know, maybe it was the Roses . . .
> Re: Off Topic A reply to "Annie" who cannot accept the truth
> Re: Mary Queen of Scots
> Tomlinson discussion, to be continued
> see: Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 19:50:28 +0800
> (this one really shows how low leo will go..definately an private
email
> gone public to rally support?)
>
> Off Topic was overkilling Burke
> Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 19:28:01 +0800
> LOOK AT THE DATES..when will LEO let it drop?
>
> Re: The "Russell" Connection not the right one for this fellow
> Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 22:17:46 +0100
>
> Re: Vernon of Haddon and Hodnet
> this one did not even concern Leo..but he felt a need to attack
annie.
> dated april 26.
>
> Re: discussion ended
> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:05:15 +0800
> hmmm..leo only attacks data..not the person..NOT
>
> Re: Naming Wars -- A comment and a Question (was Modern Germany
When?)
> see msgs 288 and 294. leo comments..actually quite civilly and dog
> hines picks up the attack.
>
> Re: Tompsett's royals site
> Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:53:30 +0200
> note the date people..note what annie is saying. when is leo going to
> let go. guess my memory slipped. i thought the attack was only going
on
> from mid april.
>
> antidotes to another spate of attacks
> Mon, 14 May 2001 18:17:36 +0200
> here annie, attempts to defend herself. seems like there are several
> people on the list who are not caught in the smoke and mirrors game
> played by leo and hines.
>
> well..i'm half way thru (45) the 92 messages containing the keywords:
> annie leo
>
> i'll let you all archive dive for remaining evidence. is leo the
> innocent? he and hines have relentlessly pursued annie. tearing apart
> any posting made, attacking her personally and publically..and leo
> wonders how his term ANNIEMALS could be misconstrued as offensive?
>
> now, that i have stood up to him..he and his dog are about to embark
on
> the same heel nipping behaviour with me. have fun boys, i have on my
> armor. and i know where to find ammunition.
>
> off list..leo wrote hines with a cc to me..it was hines's spark
> cue..'get ready for the attack." i responded to leo only..because!
> omg!..hines has killfiled me..or so he says
>
> leo responded saying hines was not hero. why he made the
statement..i'm
> not sure?..however, i am very sure..hines is leo's dog.
>
> and leo..how thick skinned am i..dunno..but i do know i grew up on a
> ranch..i can rope, dehorn, casterate, brand and step around b.s.
>
> i've been gored, trampled, dragged, scraped and gouged on barb wire
> fences and trees while breaking horses.
>
> i've also hand raised orphan calves, stitched wounded animals, worked
> daily for several weeks, removing gangerene from an dog attacked
calves
> leg to save its life..so i know the smell of fetid rot. i've walked
> seven miles leading a lame horse herding 16 head of cattle. i've
helped
> hay 11 tons of hay..and disbursed that hay to livestock in -56F
> weather.
> so..i guess, leo..i'm pretty darn tough.
>
> i was taught to think on my feet to survive. i think you'd be advised
> to play your game of bait and switch - one upmanship with easier
> targets. but..be advised..i will comment and call a spade a spade.
time
> to get off your high horse..or is that horse high. (erm..leo likes to
> accuse people of substance abuse..guess its okay for me, too.)
>
> so..gentle pogues and poguettes..here is today's lesson:
> i treat like unto like..
> if you are nasty to me..guess what you're gonna get. treat me with
> respect..and guess what you're going to get.
>
> i was also raised that you don't watch a mugging and do nothing.
>
> LEO..you may have some data i want or need..but, if you can find
> it..rest assured, i can locate it too.
>
> do not pretend you are interested in seriously genealogical research,
> if you are withholding information because of a personal disagreement
> or dislike of a person.
>
> and now to quote leo..can we please get back to genealogy.
>
> best regards
> roz
>
>

This thread: