GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

From:
Subject: Re: Mohammed the Prophet
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 21:32:08 EDT

In a message dated 6/14/01 7:18:08 PM, writes:

<< OK, now I will address the muslim part of this bogus descent.
For this I rely heavily on the writings of Kalid Yahya
Blankinship. >>

Actually, this recent exchange from Todd about Annie's posting is one of the
simplest, easy-to-follow elucidations that we have had so far on this
subject. Actually, it was clearer because Annie posted the entire line from
Mohammed -- possibly for the first time on this forum. This opened up the
topic for clear point-by-point clarification--beginning with the fact that
Zaida was the daughter-in-law, not the daughter of Muhammad III Abu I Kasim.

Is it not strange how things become simpler and clearer with repition?

-Ken



- Ken

This thread:

• Mohammed the Prophet by "Annie Natalelli-Waloszek" <>
  • Re: Mohammed the Prophet by "Todd A. Farmerie" <>
    • Re: Mohammed the Prophet by "D. Spencer Hines" <>
  • Re: Mohammed the Prophet by "Todd A. Farmerie" <>
    • Re: Mohammed the Prophet by Marin-Guzman <>
      • Re: Mohammed the Prophet by "Todd A. Farmerie" <>
        • Re: Mohammed the Prophet by "T. Stanford M. S. P. F. Mommaerts-Meulemans-Browne" <>
          • Re: Mohammed the Prophet by "Todd A. Farmerie" <>
  • Mohammed the prophet by maria emma escobar <>
    • Re: Mohammed the prophet by Francisco Antonio Doria <>

  • Re: Mohammed the Prophet by