GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2002-03 > 1015195477


From: "Chris Phillips" <>
Subject: Re: Eudo la Zouche
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 22:44:37 -0000


Patricia Junkin wrote:
> WILLIIAM DE CANTILUPO IN 1253 GAINED LUBBESTHORPE. HE ALSO HELD EYTON ,
> Beds.
> In 1304 Roger la Zouch deceased held the manor of Lubbesthorpe of William
la
> Zouch by the service of the third part of a knight¹s fee; Roger la Zouch,
> son and heir of the foresaid Roger was then aged 11 [b. 1268]. IPM 7 Edw I
> Father is Roger b. pro. 1240-50 making it impossible for him to be the son
> of Eudo and Millicent so how then could he have come to Lubesthorpe. Was
he
> holding it of William, Eudo's son? If so, why?


Thanks for the further information on the lands held by Millicent.

I don't quite follow the bit above. Was Roger, the son of Roger 11 in 1304
or in 7 Edward I? If 1304, the son would have been born 1293, and the father
could just about have been a son of Millicent, although he would have had to
been a father by about 15...

Chris Phillips


This thread: